Opinion
14845 Index No. 33642/18E Case No. 2021–00337
12-14-2021
Ada CASILLAS–REYES, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Jefferson JOHN et al., Defendants–Respondents, Andrew M. More et al., Defendants–Appellants.
Keane & Bernheimer, PLLC, Valhalla (Joel Bekker of counsel), for appellants. Law Office of Lee Greenstein, Delmar (Lee Greenstein of counsel), for Ada Casillas–Reyes, respondent. Smith Mazure Director Wilkins Young & Yagerman, P.C., New York (Louise M. Cherkis of counsel), for Jefferson John and NMJ transportation, Inc, respondents.
Keane & Bernheimer, PLLC, Valhalla (Joel Bekker of counsel), for appellants.
Law Office of Lee Greenstein, Delmar (Lee Greenstein of counsel), for Ada Casillas–Reyes, respondent.
Smith Mazure Director Wilkins Young & Yagerman, P.C., New York (Louise M. Cherkis of counsel), for Jefferson John and NMJ transportation, Inc, respondents.
Gische, J.P., Webber, Oing, Singh, Higgitt, JJ.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mary Ann Brigantti, J.), entered January 19, 2021, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendants Andrew M. More and Robert J. More's motion for leave to renew their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The "new facts" on which defendants Andrew M. More and Robert J. More based their motion for leave to renew their summary judgment motion are not material and would not change the prior determination ( CPLR 2221[e][2] ; see Foley v. Roche, 68 A.D.2d 558, 568, 418 N.Y.S.2d 588 [1st Dept. 1979] ).