From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Casey v. Inch

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Apr 22, 2019
274 So. 3d 425 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. 1D19-1008

04-22-2019

Brian M. CASEY, Petitioner, v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, State of Florida, Respondent.

Brian M. Casey, pro se, Petitioner. Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Brian M. Casey, pro se, Petitioner.

Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.

We have determined that the petition raises a frivolous claim. Petitioner is warned that any future filings that this Court determines to be frivolous may result in the imposition of sanctions, including a prohibition against any further pro se filings in this Court and a referral to the appropriate institution for disciplinary procedures as provided in section 944.279, Florida Statutes (2018) (providing that a prisoner who is found by a court to have brought a frivolous or malicious suit, action, claim, proceeding, or appeal is subject to disciplinary procedures pursuant to the rules of the Department of Corrections).

Ray, Osterhaus, and Winokur, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Casey v. Inch

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Apr 22, 2019
274 So. 3d 425 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Casey v. Inch

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN M. CASEY, Petitioner, v. MARK S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department…

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Apr 22, 2019

Citations

274 So. 3d 425 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)