From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cascioli v. Gonzalez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 16, 1991
173 A.D.2d 1064 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

May 16, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Dickinson, J.).


Defendant seeks to appeal from an ex parte order, which is not appealable as of right under CPLR 5701 (a) (see, Matter of King v Gregorie, 90 A.D.2d 922, lv dismissed 58 N.Y.2d 605, 822), and we decline to entertain the appeal as though it were a motion pursuant to CPLR 5704 (a) (see, Matter of McKee v Coughlin, 142 A.D.2d 798). The matter involves a trial court's authority to control its own calendar, and the proper procedure is for defendant to move on notice at Supreme Court to vacate the ex parte order (see, Siegel, Practice Commentaries, McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C5701:5, at 578).

Appeal dismissed, without costs. Casey, J.P., Mikoll, Levine, Mercure and Crew III, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cascioli v. Gonzalez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 16, 1991
173 A.D.2d 1064 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Cascioli v. Gonzalez

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH M. CASCIOLI JR. et al., Respondents, v. GREGORY F. GONZALEZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 16, 1991

Citations

173 A.D.2d 1064 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
570 N.Y.S.2d 402

Citing Cases

Owens v. Freeman

Initially, defendant argues that Supreme Court lacked jurisdiction to enter the default judgment because…

Halse v. Hussain

We begin by noting that defendants did not take an appeal from the October 2019 order of attachment and,…