From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Casas v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District, Waco
Nov 22, 2000
33 S.W.3d 874 (Tex. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 10-00-234-CR.

Filed November 22, 2000. Rehearing Overruled January 3, 2001

Appeal from the 182nd District Court, Harris County, Texas, Trial Court # 9414915.

Appeal dismissed.

Kenneth W. Smith, Houston, for appellant.

John B. Holmes, Jr., Harris County Dist. Atty., Houston, for appellee.

Before Chief Justice DAVIS, Justice VANCE, and Justice GRAY.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Francisco Javier Casas pleaded nolo contendere to sexual assault of a child, and, pursuant to a plea agreement, the court deferred an adjudication of guilt and placed him on community supervision for eight years. After a contested hearing, the court adjudicated Casas's guilt and sentenced him to ten years' imprisonment. Casas filed a general notice of appeal.

An appellant who has pleaded nolo contendere in exchange for deferred adjudication must comply with appellate rule 25.2(b)(3) when he seeks to appeal a subsequent adjudication and sentencing. See Craddock v. State, No. 10-00-231-CR, slip op. at 2, 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 7642, at *1-2 (Tex.App.-Waco Nov. 8, 2000, no pet. h.); see also Manuel v. State, 994 S.W.2d 658, 662 (Tex.Crim.App. 1999); Watson v. State, 924 S.W.2d 711, 714-15 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996) (both applying former appellate rule 40(b)(1)). Casas's general notice of appeal does not comply with this rule.

Because Casas's notice of appeal does not comply with rule 25.2(b)(3), we do not have jurisdiction over this appeal. See Craddock, No. 10-00-231-CR, slip op. at 2, 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 7642, at *1-2; Okigbo v. State, 960 S.W.2d 923, 925 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1998, pet. ref'd). The time for perfecting his appeal has elapsed, so this defect cannot be corrected. See State v. Riewe, 13 S.W.3d 408, 413-14 (Tex.Crim.App. 2000); Craddock, No. 10-00-231-CR, slip op. at 4, 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 7642, at *5-6. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.


Although I remain convinced that Craddock v. State was incorrectly decided, the court correctly applies that decision in this appeal. Craddock v. State, No. 10-00-231-CR (Tex.App.-Waco, November 8, 2000). Accordingly, I join the court's opinion and will hereafter do so in similar circumstances.


Summaries of

Casas v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District, Waco
Nov 22, 2000
33 S.W.3d 874 (Tex. App. 2000)
Case details for

Casas v. State

Case Details

Full title:FRANCISCO JAVIER CASAS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District, Waco

Date published: Nov 22, 2000

Citations

33 S.W.3d 874 (Tex. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

Goodwin v. State

Goodwin filed a general notice of appeal. The State contends that, because his notice of appeal does not…

Luera v. State

Accordingly, I join the court's opinion and will hereafter do so in similar circumstances.Casas v. State, 33…