From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caruthers v. Lara

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Aug 4, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14-CV-325 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 4, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14-CV-325

08-04-2014

RICKY A. CARUTHERS, Petitioner, v. WARDEN F. LARA, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM ORDER OVERRULING PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Petitioner Ricky A. Caruthers, a prisoner confined at the Federal Correctional Complex in Beaumont, Texas, proceeding pro se, filed this petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241.

The court ordered that this matter be referred to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The magistrate judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The magistrate judge recommends dismissing the petition.

The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, along with the record, pleadings, and all available evidence. Petitioner filed objections to the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation.

The court has conducted a de novo review of the objections in relation to the pleadings and the applicable law. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). After careful consideration, the court concludes the objections are without merit. Petitioner contends that the Supreme Court's decision in Begay v. United States, 553 U.S. 137 (2008), establishes that he was actually innocent of the armed career offender sentence enhancement. This claim is a challenge to petitioner's sentence, not his conviction. Therefore, dismissal is appropriate because petitioner's claim is not cognizable in a § 2241 petition under the savings clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e). Wyatt v. Warden, Federal Bureau of Prisons, 538 F. App'x 390, 391 (5th Cir. 2013).

ORDER

Accordingly, petitioner's objections are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct, and the report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate judge's recommendation.

Signed this date.

Aug 4, 2014

/s/_________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Caruthers v. Lara

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Aug 4, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14-CV-325 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 4, 2014)
Case details for

Caruthers v. Lara

Case Details

Full title:RICKY A. CARUTHERS, Petitioner, v. WARDEN F. LARA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Date published: Aug 4, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14-CV-325 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 4, 2014)