From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carter v. Mandel

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Mar 21, 1978
573 F.2d 172 (4th Cir. 1978)

Opinion

No. 77-1530.

Argued February 6, 1978.

Decided March 21, 1978.

Charles F. Morgan, Baltimore, Md. (Michael A. Millemann, The Legal Service Clinic; Richard G. Fishman, Baltimore Legal Aid Bureau, Inc., Baltimore, Md., on brief), for appellants.

Henry J. Frankel, Asst. Atty. Gen., Baltimore, Md. (Francis B. Burch, Atty. Gen. of Md., and Clarence W. Sharp, Asst. Atty. Gen., Baltimore, Md., on brief), for appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and BUTZNER and HALL, Circuit Judges.


This action was brought to challenge the adequacy of the legal assistance available to Maryland prisoners. The state has not established prison law libraries, but it operates a public defender program. The district court's opinion carefully analyzes the prisoners' needs and the public and private assistance that is available. See, Hall v. State of Maryland, 433 F. Supp. 756 (D.Md. 1977).

Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. 817, 97 S.Ct. 1491, 52 L.Ed.2d 72 (1977), decided after this case was tried, holds that failure to provide prisoners with adequate law libraries or assistance from legally trained persons violates their constitutional right of access to the courts. With one exception, the district court correctly anticipated the Supreme Court's ruling. Bounds indicates that the constitutional right of access to the courts extends to federal civil rights claims. 430 U.S. at 827, 828, n. 17, 97 S.Ct. 1491. Because the district court concluded that Maryland has no constitutional obligation to provide assistance in federal civil rights cases, 433 F. Supp. at 779-80, that aspect of the case must be remanded for reconsideration in light of Bounds.

The district court found that the legal assistance provided for all other types of litigation was constitutionally sufficient. With respect to these, we affirm. Although litigation is not static and the future may require changes, the record establishes that Maryland has commendably recognized its constitutional obligation to provide legal assistance for its prisoners.

Affirmed in part.

Vacated in part and

Remanded.


Summaries of

Carter v. Mandel

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Mar 21, 1978
573 F.2d 172 (4th Cir. 1978)
Case details for

Carter v. Mandel

Case Details

Full title:JAMES EDWARD CARTER, APPELLANT, v. MARVIN MANDEL, GOVERNOR, ROBERT J…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Mar 21, 1978

Citations

573 F.2d 172 (4th Cir. 1978)

Citing Cases

Carter v. Kamka

As that document indicates, the sole issue remanded for determination by this Court is with respect to the…

Warfield v. Harford Cnty. Det. Ctr.

Although this right has been extended to provide a right of access to an adequate law library, it is not…