From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carter v. Jones

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Eastern Division
Nov 9, 2009
CASE NO. 3:09-cv-582-ID, [WO] (M.D. Ala. Nov. 9, 2009)

Opinion

CASE NO. 3:09-cv-582-ID, [WO].

November 9, 2009


ORDER


The Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. No. 25) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. After a review of the Recommendation, and after an independent review of the entire record, the Court believes that the Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. The Defendants' Motion For Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 18) is GRANTED to the extent Defendants seek dismissal of this case due to Plaintiff's failure to properly exhaust available administrative remedies. It is further

ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) due to Plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies available to him during confinement in the Lee County Detention Center.

A separate judgment shall be entered.


Summaries of

Carter v. Jones

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Eastern Division
Nov 9, 2009
CASE NO. 3:09-cv-582-ID, [WO] (M.D. Ala. Nov. 9, 2009)
Case details for

Carter v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:SEAN M. CARTER, #267439, Plaintiff, v. JAY JONES, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Eastern Division

Date published: Nov 9, 2009

Citations

CASE NO. 3:09-cv-582-ID, [WO] (M.D. Ala. Nov. 9, 2009)

Citing Cases

Hancock v. Hood

See alsoBrown v. Sikes, 212 F.3d 1205, 1207 (11th Cir. 2000) ("[W]hen a state provides a grievance procedure…