From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carter v. Affiliated Computer Services

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Hot Springs Division
Jan 11, 2011
CASE NO. 10-6074 (W.D. Ark. Jan. 11, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 10-6074.

January 11, 2011


ORDER


Now on this 11th day of January 2011, there comes on for consideration the report and recommendation filed herein on December 15, 2010, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (Doc. 37). No objections were filed to the report and recommendation.

The court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: The report and recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration (doc. 5) is GRANTED, and a stay of these proceedings is hereby ORDERED pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 3. The parties shall advise the court within ten (10) days of any ruling in arbitration as to any remaining issues for this court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Carter v. Affiliated Computer Services

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Hot Springs Division
Jan 11, 2011
CASE NO. 10-6074 (W.D. Ark. Jan. 11, 2011)
Case details for

Carter v. Affiliated Computer Services

Case Details

Full title:MARTHA CARTER and KIMBERLY RUFF PLAINTIFFS v. AFFILIATED COMPUTER…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Hot Springs Division

Date published: Jan 11, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 10-6074 (W.D. Ark. Jan. 11, 2011)

Citing Cases

Daniel v. ABM Indus.

Indeed, at least one district court in Arkansas has taken this exact approach. See Carter v. Affiliated…