From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carroll v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 28, 2000
277 A.D.2d 414 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted November 3, 2000.

November 28, 2000.

In an action to recover damages for trespass, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.), dated August 4, 1999, which denied her motion to compel the defendant and a nonparty witness to submit to an examination before trial.

Mertylin Carroll, Brooklyn, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Shamim Ahmed, Flushing, N. Y., for respondent.

Before: WILLIAM C. THOMPSON, J.P., THOMAS R. SULLIVAN, GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, ANITA R. FLORIO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff failed to give notice requesting an oral examination of the defendant and the nonparty witness. Accordingly, the plaintiff's motion to compel the defendant and the nonparty witness to submit to an examination was premature and the Supreme Court properly denied it (see, CPLR 3107, 3124).


Summaries of

Carroll v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 28, 2000
277 A.D.2d 414 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Carroll v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:MERTYLIN CARROLL, APPELLANT, v. OCTAVIOUS WILLIAMS, RESPONDENT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 28, 2000

Citations

277 A.D.2d 414 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
715 N.Y.S.2d 911

Citing Cases

DiPardo v. Theobald

If the notice proved unavailing, then plaintiff may move to compel compliance under CPLR 3124. The motion…