From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carroll v. Ar De Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 15, 1990
167 A.D.2d 216 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

November 15, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Kristin Booth Glen, J.).


Plaintiff was injured when she was raped and sodomized by an unknown assailant on the 38th floor of the premises owned by defendant located at 150 East 58th Street. The mere existence of an intervening criminal act by a third person will not completely absolve a defendant landlord from liability where the defendant should have reasonably anticipated a risk of harm from criminal activity to persons on the premises. (Gilmartin v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 162 A.D.2d 275.) A review of the record reveals there are questions of fact as to the reasonableness of the landlord's security measures, in view of the extensive criminal activity in the subject premises during the 15-month period preceding the incident complained of.

Accordingly, summary judgment was properly denied.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Milonas, Rosenberger and Asch, JJ.


Summaries of

Carroll v. Ar De Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 15, 1990
167 A.D.2d 216 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Carroll v. Ar De Realty Corp.

Case Details

Full title:JULIE CARROLL, Respondent, v. AR DE REALTY CORP., N.V., Appellant, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 15, 1990

Citations

167 A.D.2d 216 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
561 N.Y.S.2d 721

Citing Cases

Rodriguez v. Oak Point Mgt.

In order to establish a prima facie case of negligence, the plaintiff must demonstrate: (1) a duty owed by…

Rodriguez v. Nycha

Defendant appeals and we now affirm. It is a well-established principle that a party who possesses realty,…