From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carrera Casting Corp. v. Cord

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 2, 2013
106 A.D.3d 422 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-05-2

CARRERA CASTING CORP., Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Barry CORD, Defendant–Appellant.

Russ & Russ, P.C., Massapequa (Jay Edmond Russ of counsel), for appellant. Dickstein Shapiro LLP, New York (Jeffrey A. Mitchell and Don Abraham of counsel), for respondent.


Russ & Russ, P.C., Massapequa (Jay Edmond Russ of counsel), for appellant. Dickstein Shapiro LLP, New York (Jeffrey A. Mitchell and Don Abraham of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara R. Kapnick, J.), entered October 19, 2012, awarding plaintiff the principal sum of $192,584.93 plus interest and costs, and bringing up for review an *868order, same court and Justice, entered October 11, 2012, which granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in lieu of a complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff met its prima facie burden of showing that it was entitled to recover the sums due to it under the unconditional personal guaranty, which defendant admits he executed, by proffering the instrument, invoices reflecting that defendant's company owed $192,584.93 to plaintiff, and the affidavit of plaintiff's vice president attesting to the default ( see Weissman v. Sinorm Deli, 88 N.Y.2d 437, 443–444, 646 N.Y.S.2d 308, 669 N.E.2d 242 [1996];Bank of Am., N.A. v. Solow, 59 A.D.3d 304, 874 N.Y.S.2d 48 [1st Dept. 2009],lv. dismissed12 N.Y.3d 877, 883 N.Y.S.2d 172, 910 N.E.2d 1001 [2009] ).

In opposition, defendant failed to raise a triable issue of fact. The guaranty is supported by past consideration that is clearly and unambiguously expressed in the writing ( seeGeneral Obligations Law § 5–1105; Nachem v. Property Mkts. Group, Inc., 82 A.D.3d 573, 574, 918 N.Y.S.2d 490 [1st Dept. 2011] ). Moreover, the invoices submitted by plaintiff clearly demonstrate that they relate to the subject guaranty, and they are not contradicted by defendant's submission of irrelevant documents relating to separate transactions, unrelated to the guaranty.

We have considered defendant's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

TOM, J.P., FRIEDMAN, SWEENY, FEINMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Carrera Casting Corp. v. Cord

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 2, 2013
106 A.D.3d 422 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Carrera Casting Corp. v. Cord

Case Details

Full title:CARRERA CASTING CORP., Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Barry CORD…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: May 2, 2013

Citations

106 A.D.3d 422 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 3173
963 N.Y.S.2d 867

Citing Cases

Thadani v. Liteaid, Inc.

To demonstrate entitlement to recover on a personal guaranty, a plaintiff must present evidence of the…

Round Table Partners 1 LP v. Constantine

To demonstrate entitlement to recover on a personal guaranty, a plaintiff must present evidence of the…