From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carollo v. Rose

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 4, 1974
43 A.D.2d 831 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)

Opinion

January 4, 1974


In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendants appeal from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered January 3, 1973, in favor of plaintiffs on the issue of liability only, upon a jury verdict. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. Appellant presented no contention as to the questions of fact and this court did not consider such questions. In our opinion, prejudicial error was committed in the receipt, over defendants' objection, of evidence that subsequent to the accident repairs and alterations of the accident area were undertaken by defendants (cf. Corcoran v. Village of Peekskill, 108 N.Y. 151; Del Riccio v. Montwill Corp., 16 A.D.2d 971). Rabin, P.J., Hopkins, Munder, Martuscello and Latham, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Carollo v. Rose

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 4, 1974
43 A.D.2d 831 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)
Case details for

Carollo v. Rose

Case Details

Full title:NANCY CAROLLO et al., Respondents, v. JACK ROSE et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 4, 1974

Citations

43 A.D.2d 831 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)

Citing Cases

Shvets v. Landau

During disclosure proceedings he sought service records in connection with the elevator for a one-year period…

Mable v. 384 E. Assocs., LLC

Under the circumstances of this case, the plaintiff should have foreseen the need for an expert to prove a…