From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carolina Invesco, LLC v. McGowan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Sep 29, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:10CV624 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 29, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:10CV624

09-29-2011

CAROLINA INVESCO, LLC, et al. v. CALVIN L. MCGOWAN, et al.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES

MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains her findings, conclusions, and recommendation for the disposition of this case has been presented for consideration. The Report and Recommendation recommends that the Motion to Dismiss (document #10) be granted and that the remaining claims be dismissed without prejudice for lack of personal jurisdiction. Plaintiffs filed written objections to the Report and Recommendation on September 22, 2011.

The claims against Glycotech, Inc. were dismissed without prejudice on September 20, 2011.

Having made a de novo review of the written objections filed by Plaintiffs, the Court finds that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the objections are without merit. The Court, therefore, adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as those of the Court.

In light of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss (document #10) is GRANTED and the remaining claims are DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of personal jurisdiction. Any motion not previously ruled on is DENIED.

LEONARD DAVIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Carolina Invesco, LLC v. McGowan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Sep 29, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:10CV624 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 29, 2011)
Case details for

Carolina Invesco, LLC v. McGowan

Case Details

Full title:CAROLINA INVESCO, LLC, et al. v. CALVIN L. MCGOWAN, et al.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Date published: Sep 29, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:10CV624 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 29, 2011)

Citing Cases

Tornado Bus Co. v. Bus & Coach Am. Corp.

" Id. And courts are reluctant to find jurisdiction based only on emails and phone calls because reliance on…