From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carlson v. Carlson

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 10, 1989
14 Fla. L. Weekly 2371 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion


549 So.2d 1160 (Fla.App. 3 Dist. 1989) 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2371 Katherine S. CARLSON, Appellant, v. William C. CARLSON, Appellee. No. 89-1171. Florida Court of Appeals, Third District. October 10, 1989

       David A. Donet, Miami, for appellant.

       Frank, Schmitts&s Frank and Carl A. Schmitt, North Bay Village, for appellee.

       Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and COPE, JJ.        PER CURIAM.

       The sole issue in this appeal from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage is a challenge to the trial court's failure to consider the parties' pension plans as marital assets in accordance with the holding of Diffenderfer v. Diffenderfer, 491 So.2d 265 (Fla.1986).

       The pension plans of both parties to this appeal accrued during their long-term marriage and vested before their separation. It was error to make no evidentiary findings on the value of the pension plans, and to make no finding as to the proper date for determining valuations. Bushore v. Bushore, 531 So.2d 427 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); White v. White, 527 So.2d 971 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988).

       Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Carlson v. Carlson

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 10, 1989
14 Fla. L. Weekly 2371 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Carlson v. Carlson

Case Details

Full title:KATHERINE S. CARLSON, APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM C. CARLSON, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Oct 10, 1989

Citations

14 Fla. L. Weekly 2371 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
14 Fla. L. Weekly 2371
549 So. 2d 1161

Citing Cases

Bain v. Bain

Even assuming that the wife's social security should not have been included in the marital assets, the trial…