From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cargill v. Garland

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Jun 23, 2022
37 F.4th 1091 (5th Cir. 2022)

Opinion

No. 20-51016

06-23-2022

Michael CARGILL, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Merrick GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General; United States Department of Justice; Regina Lombardo, in her official capacity as Acting Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives; Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, Defendants—Appellees.

Caleb Kruckenberg, Pacific Legal Foundation, Arlington, VA, Richard Abbott Samp, Chief Counsel, New Civil Liberties Alliance, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff—Appellant. Bradley Hinshelwood, Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Kyle T. Edwards, Mark Bernard Stern, Esq., Abby Christine Wright, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Appellate Section, Washington, DC, for Defendants—Appellees. Michael Jean, National Rifle Association of America, Fairfax, VA, for Amicus Curiae National Rifle Association of America. John D. Cline, San Francisco, CA, for Amicus Curiae Due Process Institute. William Jeffrey Olson, Esq., Vienna, VA, for Amici Curiae Gun Owners of America, Incorporated, Gun Owners Foundation, Gun Owners of California, Tennessee Firearms Association, Virginia Citizens Defense League, Arizona Citizens Defense League, Grass Roots North Carolina, Rights Watch International, Conservative Legal Defense and Education Fund, Heller Foundation. Glenn Evans Roper, Pacific Legal Foundation, Highlands Ranch, Daniel Ortner, Counsel, Pacific Legal Foundation, Sacramento, CA, for Amicus Curiae Pacific Legal Foundation. Joseph Greenlee, Firearms Policy Coalition, Sacramento, CA, for Amici Curiae Firearms Policy Coalition, Center to Keep and Bear Arms. Ian Simmons, O'Melveny & Myers, L.L.P., Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence.


Caleb Kruckenberg, Pacific Legal Foundation, Arlington, VA, Richard Abbott Samp, Chief Counsel, New Civil Liberties Alliance, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff—Appellant.

Bradley Hinshelwood, Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Kyle T. Edwards, Mark Bernard Stern, Esq., Abby Christine Wright, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Appellate Section, Washington, DC, for Defendants—Appellees.

Michael Jean, National Rifle Association of America, Fairfax, VA, for Amicus Curiae National Rifle Association of America.

John D. Cline, San Francisco, CA, for Amicus Curiae Due Process Institute.

William Jeffrey Olson, Esq., Vienna, VA, for Amici Curiae Gun Owners of America, Incorporated, Gun Owners Foundation, Gun Owners of California, Tennessee Firearms Association, Virginia Citizens Defense League, Arizona Citizens Defense League, Grass Roots North Carolina, Rights Watch International, Conservative Legal Defense and Education Fund, Heller Foundation.

Glenn Evans Roper, Pacific Legal Foundation, Highlands Ranch, Daniel Ortner, Counsel, Pacific Legal Foundation, Sacramento, CA, for Amicus Curiae Pacific Legal Foundation.

Joseph Greenlee, Firearms Policy Coalition, Sacramento, CA, for Amici Curiae Firearms Policy Coalition, Center to Keep and Bear Arms.

Ian Simmons, O'Melveny & Myers, L.L.P., Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence.

Before Richman, Chief Judge, and Jones, Smith, Stewart, Dennis, Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Costa, Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Per Curiam: A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs. Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 41.3, the panel opinion in this case dated December 14, 2021, is VACATED.


Summaries of

Cargill v. Garland

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Jun 23, 2022
37 F.4th 1091 (5th Cir. 2022)
Case details for

Cargill v. Garland

Case Details

Full title:Michael CARGILL, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Merrick GARLAND, U.S. Attorney…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Date published: Jun 23, 2022

Citations

37 F.4th 1091 (5th Cir. 2022)

Citing Cases

Cargill v. Garland

We granted rehearing en banc , vacating the panel opinion. 37 F.4th 1091.…

Guedes v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives

And it is worth noting that every circuit to have considered this question has so far upheld the Bump Stock…