From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carey v. Johnson

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 13, 2006
Civil Action No. 05-1695 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 13, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-1695.

December 13, 2006


ORDER


On December 8, 2005, the above captioned case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (doc. no. 58), filed on October 13, 2006, recommended that the motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Mark Hammer, Dr. Jamil Ahmed and Dr. Durre Ahmed (doc. no. 18) be granted and that Plaintiff's claims against non-moving Defendants Barry Johnson, Susan Myers and Matthew Morrow be dismissed in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (PLRA). In addition, it recommended that Plaintiff's motions for injunctive relief (doc. nos. 14 and 49) be denied as moot. The parties were advised they were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file written objections to the report and recommendation. Plaintiff filed Objections on November 29, 2006 (doc. no. 64). After review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the report and recommendation, and the objections thereto, the following order is entered: AND NOW, this 13th day of December, 2006;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Mark Hammer, Dr. Jamil Ahmed and Dr. Durre Ahmed (doc. no. 18) is GRANTED and Plaintiff's claims against non-moving Defendants Barry Johnson, Susan Myers and Matthew Morrow are DISMISSED in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (PLRA).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's motions for injunctive relief (doc. nos. 14 and 49) are DENIED as moot.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (doc. no. 58) of Magistrate Judge Lenihan, dated November 16, 2006 is adopted as the opinion of the court.


Summaries of

Carey v. Johnson

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 13, 2006
Civil Action No. 05-1695 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 13, 2006)
Case details for

Carey v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:DUWAYNE CAREY, Plaintiff, v. BARRY JOHNSON; SUSAN MYERS; MATTHEW MORROW…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 13, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 05-1695 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 13, 2006)

Citing Cases

Drury v. DeBellis

A. Request for Injunctive ReliefMr. Drury's claims for injunctive relief cannot proceed against M. Debellis…

Drury v. DeBellis

A. Request for Injunctive ReliefTo the extent that Mr. Drury is seeking injunctive relief from M. Debellis,…