From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carew v. Urological Surgeons of Long Island, P.C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 18, 2002
292 A.D.2d 484 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2001-04154

Argued February 21, 2002.

March 18, 2002.

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the defendant David G. Schwartz appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Davis, J.), dated April 5, 2001, as denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against him.

O'Leary O'Leary, Jamaica, N.Y. (Joseph D. Furlong and Steven O'Leary, Jr., of counsel), for appellant.

David S. Pollack, Port Washington, N.Y. (Patricia Holden of counsel), for respondent.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, HOWARD MILLER, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The claims asserted against the appellant are not time-barred (see, CPLR 214-a; Watkins v. Fromm, 108 A.D.2d 233, 237-238).

Moreover, there are questions of fact as to whether the defendant David G. Schwartz was negligent and, if so, whether his negligence was a proximate cause of the decedent's injuries (see, Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320; Yaniv v. Taub, 256 A.D.2d 273).

ALTMAN, J.P., KRAUSMAN, GOLDSTEIN and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Carew v. Urological Surgeons of Long Island, P.C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 18, 2002
292 A.D.2d 484 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Carew v. Urological Surgeons of Long Island, P.C.

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK CAREW, ETC., respondent, v. UROLOGICAL SURGEONS OF LONG ISLAND…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 18, 2002

Citations

292 A.D.2d 484 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
739 N.Y.S.2d 272

Citing Cases

Zelada v. Singh

Consequently, the Defendant failed to demonstrate, prima facie, that his alleged malpractice was not a…

Chaudhry v. Gonzales

Accordingly, and based upon all of the foregoing, defendants' motion for summary judgment is DENIED…