From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cardinal v. University of Rochester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 5, 1947
271 App. Div. 1048 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)

Opinion

March 5, 1947.

Present — Taylor, P.J., Dowling, McCurn, Larkin and Love, JJ. [ 188 Misc. 823.]


Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party, with leave to the defendant [University of Rochester], if so advised, to renew the motion for permission to perform a bone marrow biopsy upon other and sufficient papers showing the necessity for such examination, the details of the procedure employed in making it, the frequency with which it has been done, together with the experience and observations which have been made by physicians as to pain, harm, or after results of any nature, occurring to persons so examined. All concur. (The order grants in part defendant's motion for a medical examination of plaintiff before trial.)


Summaries of

Cardinal v. University of Rochester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 5, 1947
271 App. Div. 1048 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)
Case details for

Cardinal v. University of Rochester

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR CARDINAL, Appellant, v. UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 5, 1947

Citations

271 App. Div. 1048 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)

Citing Cases

Lefkowitz v. Nassau Med

Although the degree and type of proof necessary to show safety may vary from case to case, the seeking party…

Langelier v. Ford

had not been completed (see, Judiciary Law § 148-a; 22 NYCRR 202.56). Counsel for the Medical College also…