Opinion
Civil Action 7:21-CV-135
07-12-2022
LYZA CARDENAS, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Defendant.
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Randy Crane United States District Judge
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), which action has been referred to the Magistrate Judge for report and recommendation. On June 3, 2022, the Magistrate Judge issued the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. Entry No. 25), recommending that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be granted in part and denied in part, that the Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment be granted in part and denied in part, and that the Commissioner's final decision to deny benefits be vacated and remanded to the agency for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation. Neither party timely filed objections to the Report and Recommendation.
Pursuant to Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report and Recommendation. Finding no clearly erroneous error, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. Entry No. 25) in its entirety. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. Entry No. 13) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, that the Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. Entry No. 17) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, and that the Commissioner's final decision to deny benefits is VACATED and REMANDED to the agency for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation.
SO ORDERED