Opinion
April 14, 1986
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Velsor, J.).
Order affirmed, insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
Temporary maintenance is designed to insure that the needy spouse is provided with sufficient funds to meet his or her reasonable needs pending trial (cf. Jorgensen v. Jorgensen, 86 A.D.2d 861). A review of the record indicates that Special Term did not abuse its discretion in fixing the award of pendente lite relief in this case. The issue of whether maintenance should be continued, the future financial circumstances of the parties, and other matters are best resolved at a trial of the matrimonial action (see, Kaltenbach v. Kaltenbach, 88 A.D.2d 582, appeal dismissed 57 N.Y.2d 736). Mangano, J.P., Gibbons, Thompson and Bracken, JJ., concur.