From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caracciolo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 18, 1996
683 So. 2d 1165 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 96-3336.

December 18, 1996.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Paul L. Backman, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 86-10657CF10, 86-8238CF10 86-6299CF10.

Anthony Caracciolo, Daytona Beach, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carol Cobourn Asbury, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for appellee.


We reverse the trial court's order summarily denying Appellant's motion for post-conviction relief under rule 3.800, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. If the trial court again denies relief on remand, it is directed to attach to its order those portions of the record which establish conclusively that Appellant is not entitled to relief: the entire judgment and sentence, reflecting, as Appellant contends and the state does not dispute, that Appellant was ordered to pay neither costs nor restitution in the cases in question.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

POLEN, FARMER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Caracciolo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 18, 1996
683 So. 2d 1165 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Caracciolo v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY CARACCIOLO, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Dec 18, 1996

Citations

683 So. 2d 1165 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

Caracciolo v. McDonough

In 1995, Mr. Caracciolo filed his second Rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief. The trial court again…