From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Capritto v. David L. Flynn Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 29, 1990
166 A.D.2d 682 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

October 29, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Durante, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The instant action arises out of a two-vehicle accident which occurred on January 20, 1986, on Woodhaven Boulevard in Queens County. The gravamen of the plaintiffs' action was that the defendant Eugene McGowan was negligent in failing to avoid the accident.

At trial, the plaintiff Salvatore Capritto could not remember how the accident happened, due to the severity of his injuries. However, other testimony adduced during the plaintiffs' case indicated that a Toyota Corolla driven northbound on Woodhaven Boulevard by the plaintiff Salvatore Capritto inexplicably went out of control, jumped the concrete, 8-inch-high and 5-foot-wide divider separating northbound and southbound traffic, and struck a Ford van which was being driven southbound on Woodhaven Boulevard, in an otherwise proper manner, by the defendant McGowan. The uncontradicted testimony of the defendant McGowan, who was called as a witness by the plaintiffs, indicated that he observed the plaintiffs' Toyota in the air coming over the divider a "split second before impact" and applied his brakes. Under these circumstances, the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case that the defendant was negligent in failing to avoid impact. Nor does the amnesia of the plaintiff Salvatore Capritto compel a different result. Although a "plaintiff who suffers amnesia as the result of a defendant's acts is not held to as high a degree of proof in establishing his right to recover for injury as a plaintiff who can describe the events" (Sawyer v. Dreis Krump Mfg. Co., 67 N.Y.2d 328, 333), he must "still establish a prima facie case" (Sawyer v. Dreis Krump Mfg. Co., supra, at 334).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint at the close of the plaintiffs' case. Mangano, P.J., Kunzeman, Kooper, Sullivan and Ritter, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Capritto v. David L. Flynn Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 29, 1990
166 A.D.2d 682 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Capritto v. David L. Flynn Associates

Case Details

Full title:SALVATORE CAPRITTO et al., Appellants, v. DAVID L. FLYNN ASSOCIATES et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 29, 1990

Citations

166 A.D.2d 682 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
561 N.Y.S.2d 276

Citing Cases

Seery v. Mulholland

Nor does the plaintiff's amnesia compel a different result. Although a plaintiff who suffers amnesia as a…