From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Capital Bank v. Engar

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 9, 1989
545 So. 2d 317 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Summary

holding that where bank had restructured corporate debt without the consent of the guarantor, to the detriment of the guarantor, the guarantor was released from the guarantee

Summary of this case from Boneh, Inc. v. Daly

Opinion

No. 88-2212.

May 9, 1989.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Stuart M. Simons, J.

Wallace, Engels, Pertnoy, Solowsky, Newman Allen, and Todd A. Fodiman, Dana Corbo and Marianne A. Vos, Miami, for appellant.

Bailey Hunt, and Jesse C. Jones and Ellen Sue Venzer, Miami, for appellees.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and COPE, JJ.


This is an appeal by defendant Capital Bank from an adverse declaratory judgment which discharged the plaintiffs H. Stuart Engar and Mariene D. Engar from a continuing guarantee on a corporate debt owed to Capital Bank. We affirm the declaratory judgment under review upon a holding that Capital Bank's subsequent restructuring of the guaranteed corporate debt [without the consent of the plaintiff guarantors and after they had revoked the guarantee as to any new debts pursuant to the terms of the guarantee] so that any payments on the restructured debt would first have to be applied to and satisfy a new personal debt of one of the corporate principals before being applied to the guaranteed corporate debt, materially altered the principal debtor's obligation to the detriment of the subject guarantors — and, accordingly, the guarantors were released from the continuing guarantee. Contrary to Capital Bank's argument, the terms of the continuing guarantee did not permit [particularly after the guarantors' revocation] the aforesaid restructuring of the original guaranteed debt so as to place any payments on the guaranteed debt behind payments on the personal indebtedness of one of the corporate principals. Causeway Lumber Co. v. King, 502 So.2d 80, 81 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Warner v. Caldwell, 354 So.2d 91, 96 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977), cert. denied, 361 So.2d 836 (Fla. 1978); Dorsy v. Maryland Nat'l Bank, 334 So.2d 273, 274 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Ahrens Materials, Inc. v. J.D. Yaun Roofing Corp., 227 So.2d 87 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969); Miami Nat'l Bank v. Fink, 174 So.2d 38, 40 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 180 So.2d 658 (Fla. 1965);

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Capital Bank v. Engar

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 9, 1989
545 So. 2d 317 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

holding that where bank had restructured corporate debt without the consent of the guarantor, to the detriment of the guarantor, the guarantor was released from the guarantee

Summary of this case from Boneh, Inc. v. Daly
Case details for

Capital Bank v. Engar

Case Details

Full title:CAPITAL BANK, APPELLANT, v. H. STUART ENGAR AND MARLENE D. ENGAR, APPELLEES

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: May 9, 1989

Citations

545 So. 2d 317 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

Boneh, Inc. v. Daly

Baitcher v. National Indus. Bank of Miami, 368 So.2d 439 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). See also Capital Bank v. Engar,…