From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cantrell v. Jackson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION
Apr 10, 2013
No. 2:12CV00018 JLH/JTR (E.D. Ark. Apr. 10, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:12CV00018 JLH/JTR

04-10-2013

JIMMY SHAKE CANTRELL, ADC #98730 PLAINTIFF v. MOSES JACKSON, East Arkansas Regional Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction DEFENDANT


ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. No objections have been filed. After careful review, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

1. Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Document #52.

2. The Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.

___________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Cantrell v. Jackson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION
Apr 10, 2013
No. 2:12CV00018 JLH/JTR (E.D. Ark. Apr. 10, 2013)
Case details for

Cantrell v. Jackson

Case Details

Full title:JIMMY SHAKE CANTRELL, ADC #98730 PLAINTIFF v. MOSES JACKSON, East Arkansas…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 10, 2013

Citations

No. 2:12CV00018 JLH/JTR (E.D. Ark. Apr. 10, 2013)