From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cannon v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
Dec 3, 2012
CRIMINAL NO. 5:00-CR-81 (MTT) (M.D. Ga. Dec. 3, 2012)

Opinion

CRIMINAL NO. 5:00-CR-81 (MTT) CIVIL NO. 5:11-CV-90106 (MTT)

12-03-2012

ROY THOMAS CANNON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


ORDER

Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (Doc. 33) on the Petitioner's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence (Doc. 27) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Magistrate Judge recommends denying the Petitioner's motion because his claims are procedurally defaulted, and the Petitioner has failed to show that he is entitled to equitable tolling or that he is actually innocent. The Magistrate Judge additionally recommends the Court deny the Petitioner a certificate of appealability because he has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). The Petitioner did not object to the Magistrate Judge's recommendations.

The Court has reviewed the record in this case. The Court has also reviewed the Petitioner's Motion and the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation. The Recommendation is adopted, and the Petitioner's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence is DENIED. Further, the petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Therefore, a certificate of appealability is also DENIED.

_______________

MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Cannon v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
Dec 3, 2012
CRIMINAL NO. 5:00-CR-81 (MTT) (M.D. Ga. Dec. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Cannon v. United States

Case Details

Full title:ROY THOMAS CANNON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION

Date published: Dec 3, 2012

Citations

CRIMINAL NO. 5:00-CR-81 (MTT) (M.D. Ga. Dec. 3, 2012)

Citing Cases

Williams v. United States

"[A] claim of mere legal innocence, not factual innocence, [] cannot open up a gateway to consideration of…