From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cannon v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 21, 2006
27 A.D.3d 607 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

2005-04298.

March 21, 2006.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Partnow, J.), dated April 6, 2005, as denied the defendants' cross motion pursuant to CPLR 510 (2) to transfer venue from Kings County to New York County.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Edward F.X. Hart and Jane L. Gordon of counsel), for appellants.

Michael B. Palillo, P.C., New York, N.Y., for respondent.

Before: Adams, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein, Skelos and Dillon, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The denial of the cross motion pursuant to CPLR 510 (2) to transfer venue was a provident exercise of discretion ( see Krupka v. County of Westchester, 160 AD2d 681).


Summaries of

Cannon v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 21, 2006
27 A.D.3d 607 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Cannon v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:JILL CANNON, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 21, 2006

Citations

27 A.D.3d 607 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 2153
810 N.Y.S.2d 673

Citing Cases

Palma v. City of New York

Plaintiff's counsel relies on Jablonski v Trost, 245 AD2d 338 [2nd Dept 1997] and Cannon v City of New York…

New Hope Missionary Baptist Church, Inc. v. 466 Lafayette Ltd.

In Behrins & Behrins, P.C. v. Chan (40 AD3d 560 [2d Dept 2007], the Court at 560–561, could have been…