From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Canady v. Mann

Supreme Court of North Carolina
May 1, 1993
333 N.C. 569 (N.C. 1993)

Opinion

No. 349PA92

Filed 7 May 1993

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. 7A-31 of a decision of the Court of Appeals, 107 N.C. App. 252, 419 S.E.2d 597 (1992), insofar as it reversed in part summary judgment for defendants Brinn and Carolina Lakes Corporation entered by Clark, J., in Superior Court, Cumberland County, on 1 April 1992. Heard in the Supreme Court 13 April 1993.

Rose, Ray, Winfrey O'Connor, P.A., by Ronald E. Winfrey and Pamela S. Leslie, for plaintiff-appellees.

Brown Robbins, by D.T. Scarborough III, for defendant-appellants Brinn and Carolina Lakes Corporation.


After consideration of the new briefs and oral arguments, the Court determines that defendants Brinn and Carolina Lakes Corporation's petition for discretionary review was improvidently allowed.

DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

Justice Parker did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.


Summaries of

Canady v. Mann

Supreme Court of North Carolina
May 1, 1993
333 N.C. 569 (N.C. 1993)
Case details for

Canady v. Mann

Case Details

Full title:DONALD R. CANADY, SR., AND CONNIE H. CANADY v. OSCAR MANN, GAINES R…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: May 1, 1993

Citations

333 N.C. 569 (N.C. 1993)
429 S.E.2d 348

Citing Cases

W. 4th, LLC v. Brown

As a matter of law, a non-party to a contract "cannot be held liable for any breach that may have occurred."…

McDowell Res. Corp. v. Tactical Support Equip., Inc.

See id. To establish a claim under North Carolina's UTPA, a claimant must show: (1) an unfair or deceptive…