From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Canadanovic v. Cent. Absorption of LIC, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Apr 22, 2021
193 A.D.3d 1246 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

528982

04-22-2021

In the Matter of the Claim of Dusan CANADANOVIC, Claimant, v. CENTRAL ABSORPTION OF LIC, INC., Appellant. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

Schaefer Law Group, PC, Smithtown (Wayne J. Schaefer of counsel), for appellant. Letitia James, Attorney General, New York City (Donya Fernandez of counsel), for respondent.


Schaefer Law Group, PC, Smithtown (Wayne J. Schaefer of counsel), for appellant.

Letitia James, Attorney General, New York City (Donya Fernandez of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Garry, P.J., Lynch, Clark, Mulvey and Reynolds Fitzgerald, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Garry, P.J.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed October 1, 2018, which ruled, among other things, that the employer failed to comply with 12 NYCRR 300.13(b)(1) and denied review of a decision by the Workers’ Compensation Law Judge.

The employer appealed from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board rendered in October 2018. Following oral argument, this Court received a December 15, 2020 Board resolution that accepted the case for full Board review and, upon due consideration, the full Board rescinded the October 2018 decision and referred the case to the Board panel for further consideration. The Board panel then issued a decision, dated December 23, 2020, that rescinded the May 2018 decision of a Workers’ Compensation Law Judge and remitted the matter to the hearing calendar for further development of the record on certain issues. Because the decision on appeal has been rescinded, as was the underlying May 2018 decision upon which the administrative appeal to the Board was based, this appeal is now moot, and, as we find no exception to the mootness doctrine, we dismiss the appeal (see Matter of Carey v. Westchester County Dept. of Corr., 171 A.D.3d 1414, 1416, 97 N.Y.S.3d 811 [2019] ; Matter of Weygant v. Walter Kroll, Inc., 286 A.D.2d 818, 818, 730 N.Y.S.2d 262 [2001] ).

Lynch, Clark and Reynolds Fitzgerald, JJ., concur; Mulvey, J., not taking part.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

Canadanovic v. Cent. Absorption of LIC, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Apr 22, 2021
193 A.D.3d 1246 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

Canadanovic v. Cent. Absorption of LIC, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of Dusan Canadanovic, Claimant, v. Central…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 22, 2021

Citations

193 A.D.3d 1246 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
193 A.D.3d 1246
2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 2442

Citing Cases

Blanch v. Delta Airlines

Claimant concedes, however, that the carrier was under no direction to make or continue indemnity payments as…