From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Campbell v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation

United States District Court, N.D. California
Aug 19, 2009
Case No. C05-05434 CW (N.D. Cal. Aug. 19, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. C05-05434 CW.

August 19, 2009

Pamela Y. Price, Grace Chung, Attorneys for Plaintiff, JOHN E. CAMPBELL.

Patrick C. Mullin (SBN 72041), Dylan B. Carp (SBN 196846), JACKSON LEWIS LLP, San Francisco, California, Attorneys for Defendants, NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION dba AMTRAK and JOE DEELY.


ORDER GRANTING AS MODIFIED STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR AWARD OF REASONABLE ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS


Plaintiff John Campbell and Defendant National Passenger Railroad Corporation submit this stipulation to continue the hearing on Plaintiff's Motion for Award of Reasonable Attorneys' Fees and Costs from September 3, 2009 until September 17, 2009.

THE HEARING IS VACATED AND THE MOTION WILL BE DECIDED ON THE PAPERS. OPPOSITION IS DUE BY 9/3/09 AND A REPLY BY 9/10/09.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

IT IS SO ORDERED AS MODIFIED


Summaries of

Campbell v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation

United States District Court, N.D. California
Aug 19, 2009
Case No. C05-05434 CW (N.D. Cal. Aug. 19, 2009)
Case details for

Campbell v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation

Case Details

Full title:JOHN EARL CAMPBELL, Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Aug 19, 2009

Citations

Case No. C05-05434 CW (N.D. Cal. Aug. 19, 2009)

Citing Cases

Thompson v. C&H Sugar Co.

Courts have since explained that this remark was stray not only because it was isolated, but because it was…

Coleman v. C&H Sugar Co.

Courts have since explained that this remark was stray not only because it was isolated, but because it was…