From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Campanhac v. Lauramore

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Mar 8, 2019
264 So. 3d 412 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 5D18-1001 Case No. 5D18-1002

03-08-2019

Noel B. CAMPANHAC, Appellant, v. Riley LAURAMORE, Appellee. and Noel B. Campanhac, Appellant, v. Beverly Lauramore, Appellee.

Eric J. Friday, of Kingry & Friday, Jacksonville, for Appellant. No Appearance for Appellees.


Eric J. Friday, of Kingry & Friday, Jacksonville, for Appellant.

No Appearance for Appellees.

HARRIS, J.

Appellant, Noel Campanhac, appeals the trial court's final judgments of injunction for protection against stalking in these related cases, arguing that there was insufficient evidence of stalking to support the injunctions. After considering the limited testimony and evidence presented below and without the benefit of briefs or any appearance by Appellees, we agree with Appellant that there was no competent, substantial evidence to support a finding of stalking. See Packal v. Johnson, 226 So.3d 337, 338 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) (holding that each incident of stalking must be proven by competent, substantial evidence to support injunction against stalking). Accordingly, we reverse the injunction.

This Court has consolidated these cases for purposes of this opinion only.

REVERSED.

LAMBERT and SASSO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Campanhac v. Lauramore

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Mar 8, 2019
264 So. 3d 412 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Campanhac v. Lauramore

Case Details

Full title:NOEL B. CAMPANHAC, Appellant, v. RILEY LAURAMORE, Appellee. and NOEL B…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Mar 8, 2019

Citations

264 So. 3d 412 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)