From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Camp v. Yeargan

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Apr 1, 2010
2010 Ark. 160 (Ark. 2010)

Opinion

CR 10-162

Opinion Delivered April 1, 2010

Pro Se Petition for Writ of Mandamus [Circuit Court of Howard County, CR 2008-93], Petition Moot.


On February 17, 2010, petitioner Wyouman David Camp filed the pro se petition for writ of mandamus that is now before us. He contended in the petition that the Honorable Charles Yeargan, Circuit Judge, had failed to act on a motion for appointment of counsel that petitioner had filed in the Circuit Court of Howard County on November 5, 2009.

On February 22, 2010, Judge Yeargan entered an order disposing of the motion. As the court has acted on the motion, the petition for writ of mandamus is moot. Strong v. Thyer, 2010 Ark. 19 (per curiam); Cummings v. Proctor, 2009 Ark. 588 (per curiam).

Petition moot.


Summaries of

Camp v. Yeargan

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Apr 1, 2010
2010 Ark. 160 (Ark. 2010)
Case details for

Camp v. Yeargan

Case Details

Full title:Wyouman David CAMP, Petitioner v. Hon. Charles YEARGAN, Circuit Judge…

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Apr 1, 2010

Citations

2010 Ark. 160 (Ark. 2010)

Citing Cases

Stephenson v. Humphrey

As the court has acted on the petition and motion, the petition for writ of mandamus is moot. White v.…

Glaze v. Reynolds

Petitioner's request for mandamus relief in regard to those claims is therefore now moot. See Nelson v.…