From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Camoscio v. Board of Registration in Podiatry

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Nov 2, 1990
561 N.E.2d 516 (Mass. 1990)

Opinion

November 2, 1990.

Jurisdiction, Equitable.

Frank J. Camoscio, pro se, submitted a brief.


The plaintiff, Frank J. Camoscio, appeals from the dismissal by a single justice of his complaint for equitable relief pursuant to G.L.c. 214, § 1 (1988 ed.). The plaintiff seeks equitable relief for the same issues he previously has brought to the court's attention. See Camoscio v. Board of Registration in Podiatry, 394 Mass. 1006, 1006-1007 (1985). See also Camoscio v. Board of Registration in Podiatry, 385 Mass. 1002-1003, cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1139 (1982); Camoscio v. Board of Registration in Podiatry of Mass., United States District Court Civil Action No. 85-3460-MA. The complaint was correctly dismissed by the single justice. It raises no issues not raised in the prior appeals or complaints and discloses no basis for equitable relief.

The judgment is affirmed. Further, it is ordered that neither the clerk of this court for Suffolk County (single justice session) nor the clerk for the Commonwealth (full court) accept any further filings from the plaintiff unless at least four Justices of this court authorize the filing.

So ordered.


Summaries of

Camoscio v. Board of Registration in Podiatry

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Nov 2, 1990
561 N.E.2d 516 (Mass. 1990)
Case details for

Camoscio v. Board of Registration in Podiatry

Case Details

Full title:FRANK J. CAMOSCIO vs. BOARD OF REGISTRATION IN PODIATRY

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts

Date published: Nov 2, 1990

Citations

561 N.E.2d 516 (Mass. 1990)
561 N.E.2d 516

Citing Cases

Watson v. a Justice of the Boston Division

The clerk of this court for Suffolk County and the clerk for the Commonwealth are instructed not to accept…

Reznik v. Garoffo

As a practical matter, as the court proceeded to rule on all of Reznik's subsequent, often redundant motions,…