From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cambridge Integrated Servs. Grp., Inc. v. Johnson

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jun 14, 2013
107 A.D.3d 1588 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-06-14

CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES GROUP, INC., Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Brian J. JOHNSON, Defendant–Respondent, and Kenneth P. Bernas, Defendant.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Paula L. Feroleto, J.), entered April 13, 2012. The order granted the motion of defendant Brian J. Johnson to compel plaintiff to comply with the release agreement entered into by the parties. Barth Sullivan Behr, Buffalo (Laurence D. Behr of Counsel), for Plaintiff–Appellant. Gross, Shuman, Brizdle & Gilfillan, P.C., Buffalo (Katherine M. Liebner of Counsel), for Defendant–Respondent.


Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Paula L. Feroleto, J.), entered April 13, 2012. The order granted the motion of defendant Brian J. Johnson to compel plaintiff to comply with the release agreement entered into by the parties.
Barth Sullivan Behr, Buffalo (Laurence D. Behr of Counsel), for Plaintiff–Appellant. Gross, Shuman, Brizdle & Gilfillan, P.C., Buffalo (Katherine M. Liebner of Counsel), for Defendant–Respondent.
MEMORANDUM:

Supreme Court erred in granting the motion of Brian J. Johnson (defendant) to compel plaintiff to comply with the release agreement between plaintiff and defendants. Defendant brought his motion after the related third-party action was settled and an unconditional stipulation of discontinuation as to him with respect to this action was signed by the attorneys for plaintiff and defendant and filed. Although a trial court has the power “to exercise supervisory control over all phases of pending actions and proceedings” ( Teitelbaum Holdings v. Gold, 48 N.Y.2d 51, 54, 421 N.Y.S.2d 556, 396 N.E.2d 1029), it lacks jurisdiction to entertain a motion after the action has been “unequivocally terminated ... [by the execution of] an express, unconditional stipulation of discontinuance” ( id. at 56, 421 N.Y.S.2d 556, 396 N.E.2d 1029;see Yonkers Fur Dressing Co. v. Royal Ins. Co., 247 N.Y. 435, 444, 160 N.E. 778;DiBella v. Martz, 58 A.D.3d 935, 937, 871 N.Y.S.2d 453;Germanovich v. Bethlehem Steel Corp. [Appeal No. 1], 270 A.D.2d 863, 863, 705 N.Y.S.2d 910).

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the motion is denied.

SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, VALENTINO, and WHALEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cambridge Integrated Servs. Grp., Inc. v. Johnson

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jun 14, 2013
107 A.D.3d 1588 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Cambridge Integrated Servs. Grp., Inc. v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES GROUP, INC., Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Brian…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 14, 2013

Citations

107 A.D.3d 1588 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
966 N.Y.S.2d 723
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 4510

Citing Cases

69 Columbia St. Realty LLC v. SDS Colcon Owners LLC

See Gardner v. Board of Education Central School Dist. No. 1 Towns of Saugerties, et al. , 28 AD2d 616 (3rd…

SO & CO Watch LLC v. BT Supplies W.

Although a trial court has the power to exercise supervisory control over all phases of pending actions and…