From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Calloway v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Sep 4, 1998
718 So. 2d 268 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 97-2004

September 4, 1998

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Tonya Rainwater, Judge.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Nancy Ryan, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Simone P. Firley and Belle B. Turner, Assistant Attorneys General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Calloway appeals his sentence imposed after he pled no contest to one count of burglary of an occupied structure. The judge sentenced Calloway to ten years as an habitual offender. His main point on appeal is that the court erred in imposing an habitual offender sentence because it employed the pre-1993 criteria and ignored the additional requirement that one of the qualifying prior offenses not be for drug possession. We affirm.

§§ 810.02(1) and (4); 810.07, Fla. Stat. (1997).

At the plea hearing, the judge informed Calloway that the state had announced its intention to seek enhanced penalties for habitual offender treatment, with a maximum possible sentence of ten years in prison. Sentencing was held July 7, 1997, and the parties agreed the sentencing guidelines scoresheet, which showed a permissible guidelines sentencing range of 15 to 25 months in prison, was correct. Defense counsel did not object to the sentence at the sentencing hearing. He failed to file a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b), as well as a motion to correct the sentence after the alleged sentencing error had occurred, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.020(h).

Thus, we must conclude that the sentencing error was not preserved and therefore cannot be raised in the direct appeal. See § 921.051 (effective July 1, 1996); Fla.R.App. P. 9.140(b). Hubbard v. State, 691 So.2d 645 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), citing Middleton v. State, 689 So.2d 304 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). Further, even if we were to reach the merits of Calloway's appeal, there was sufficient evidence adduced in the record to establish Calloway had been convicted at a prior time of two nondrug-related felonies.

AFFIRMED.

COBB and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Calloway v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Sep 4, 1998
718 So. 2d 268 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Calloway v. State

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE CALLOWAY, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Sep 4, 1998

Citations

718 So. 2d 268 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Citing Cases

State v. Jefferson

Finally, the Fifth District has not directly passed on the jurisdictional question; however, it has focused…

Leonard v. State

Further, if the State did not file a motion to dismiss, the Fourth District announced that it would summarily…