From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Calip v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Jan 15, 2009
Case No. CIV-08-15-L (W.D. Okla. Jan. 15, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. CIV-08-15-L.

January 15, 2009


ORDER


On December 19, 2008, Magistrate Judge Doyle W. Argo entered his Report and Recommendation in this action brought by plaintiff for judicial review pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) of the final decision of the defendant Commissioner of the Social Security Administration ("Commissioner") denying his applications for supplemental security income and disability insurance benefits. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Commissioner's decision be reversed and the matter be remanded for further administrative proceedings consistent with the December 19, 2008 Report and Recommendation.

The court file reflects that no party has filed a written objection to the Report and Recommendation within the time limit allowed. Upon de novo review, the court finds that the the Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby adopted in its entirety.

Accordingly, the decision of the Commissioner to deny plaintiff's applications for supplemental security income and disability insurance benefits is REVERSED. The case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings consistent with the December 19, 2008 Report and Recommendation of Judge Argo.

It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Calip v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Jan 15, 2009
Case No. CIV-08-15-L (W.D. Okla. Jan. 15, 2009)
Case details for

Calip v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:CLINT I. CALIP, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Jan 15, 2009

Citations

Case No. CIV-08-15-L (W.D. Okla. Jan. 15, 2009)

Citing Cases

Griego v. Colvin

Case law on this issue is also not uniform. Many courts have refused to discern any conflict between the…

Earhart v. Colvin

(Tr. 49). As such is the case, this Court cannot conclude that the vocational expert's testimony conflicts…