From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caliber Home Loans Inc. v. Xiu Lian Tang

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
May 9, 2019
172 A.D.3d 476 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

9251 Index 35367/14E

05-09-2019

CALIBER HOME LOANS INC., E Plaintiff–Respondent, v. XIU LIAN TANG, et al., Defendants–Appellants.

Law Offices of Vincent S. Wong, New York (Eugene Kroner of counsel), for appellants. Stern & Eisenberg, P.C., Depew (Margaret J. Cascino of counsel), for respondent.


Law Offices of Vincent S. Wong, New York (Eugene Kroner of counsel), for appellants.

Stern & Eisenberg, P.C., Depew (Margaret J. Cascino of counsel), for respondent.

Sweeny, J.P., Gische, Tom, Gesmer, Singh, JJ.

Judgment of foreclosure and sale, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ben R. Barbato, J.), entered September 22, 2017, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendants waived the defense of lack of standing by failing to assert it in the answer or in a timely motion to dismiss ( CPLR 3211[e] ; Bank of Am., N.A. v. Brannon, 156 A.D.3d 1, 7, 63 N.Y.S.3d 352 [1st Dept. 2017] ). The defense of lack of personal jurisdiction fails in view of defendant Jian Shi Xu's pro se answer and the subsequent appearance of counsel on behalf of both defendants ( CPLR 321[a] ; National Loan Invs., L.P. v. Piscitello, 21 A.D.3d 537, 801 N.Y.S.2d 331 [2d Dept. 2005] ).


Summaries of

Caliber Home Loans Inc. v. Xiu Lian Tang

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
May 9, 2019
172 A.D.3d 476 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Caliber Home Loans Inc. v. Xiu Lian Tang

Case Details

Full title:Caliber Home Loans Inc., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Xiu Lian Tang, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: May 9, 2019

Citations

172 A.D.3d 476 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 3664
97 N.Y.S.3d 854

Citing Cases

In re Benson

In addition, Benson filed the note of issue in this proceeding as petitioner without any objection by…

Globe Trade Capital, LLC v. Hoey

Therefore, the court properly found that its determination in the order dated June 1, 2017, constituted law…