From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caldwell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Oct 27, 2014
163 So. 3d 1189 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. 2D14–4762.

10-27-2014

Craig CALDWELL, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).


Opinion

BY ORDER OF THE COURT.

The petitioner's motion for clarification is granted. His motion to reopen case due to fraud or mistake of appellate counsel is being treated as a petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. The mandate in 2D89–406 having issued June 5, 1990, the petition is dismissed as untimely. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(d)(5). The petition is also successive to cases 2D04–3939 and 2D05–4873.

NORTHCUTT, CRENSHAW, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Caldwell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Oct 27, 2014
163 So. 3d 1189 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

Caldwell v. State

Case Details

Full title:Craig CALDWELL, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Date published: Oct 27, 2014

Citations

163 So. 3d 1189 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)