Opinion
No. 2D14–4762.
10-27-2014
Opinion
BY ORDER OF THE COURT.
The petitioner's motion for clarification is granted. His motion to reopen case due to fraud or mistake of appellate counsel is being treated as a petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. The mandate in 2D89–406 having issued June 5, 1990, the petition is dismissed as untimely. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(d)(5). The petition is also successive to cases 2D04–3939 and 2D05–4873.
NORTHCUTT, CRENSHAW, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.