From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cahill v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 13, 1985
478 So. 2d 376 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

No. 84-2266.

October 11, 1985. Rehearing Denied November 13, 1985.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Pasco County, W. Lowell Bray, Jr., J.

H. Michael Evans of Mosley Evans, P.A., Clearwater, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Davis G. Anderson, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


The appellant challenges the revocation of his probation and the sentence imposed upon revocation. We reject the challenge to the revocation of probation, but agree with the defendant that he was improperly given a guidelines sentence.

The defendant was placed on probation for an offense committed on September 7, 1982. The record does not reflect that the defendant affirmatively selected to be sentenced under the guidelines. In the absence of such a selection, the sentencing guidelines may not be applied. Cahill v. State, 467 So.2d 366 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for resentencing. At resentencing the appellant may affirmatively select to be sentenced under the guidelines. If he does not, the trial judge must resentence him according to the law in effect prior to the adoption of the guidelines.

REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cahill v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 13, 1985
478 So. 2d 376 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

Cahill v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT WILLIAM CAHILL, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Nov 13, 1985

Citations

478 So. 2d 376 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Citing Cases

Cahill v. State

This case was previously appealed. Cahill v. State, 478 So.2d 376 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). This court reversed…