From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cadin Contr. Inc. v. Kenneth L. Rich Agency

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 5, 1990
158 A.D.2d 442 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

February 5, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Christ, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for a hearing to determine whether the appellant was properly served with the summons.

The sworn denial by the defendant Kenneth L. Rich that he had been personally served with process under CPLR 308 (1) sufficiently controverted the process server's affidavit so as to require a hearing on the issue of jurisdiction (see, Frankel v Schilling, 149 A.D.2d 657; Skyline Agency v Ambrose Coppotelli, Inc., 117 A.D.2d 135, 139; Cranesville Block Co. v Carpenter, 88 A.D.2d 1015). If service was not properly made, the court would accordingly lack jurisdiction over the appellant and the default judgment would be a nullity as against him (see, Citibank v Keller, 133 A.D.2d 63, 64; Chase Manhattan Bank v Carlson, 113 A.D.2d 734, 735). However, if the court finds service was correctly made then, under the circumstances of this case, the motion to vacate the default judgment should be denied. Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cadin Contr. Inc. v. Kenneth L. Rich Agency

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 5, 1990
158 A.D.2d 442 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Cadin Contr. Inc. v. Kenneth L. Rich Agency

Case Details

Full title:CADIN CONTRACTING INC., Respondent, v. KENNETH L. RICH AGENCY, Defendant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 5, 1990

Citations

158 A.D.2d 442 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
551 N.Y.S.2d 43

Citing Cases

U.S. Equities Corp. v. Morselli

Upon a review of the record, we find that defendant's sworn motion papers sufficiently raised issues of fact…

Taylor v. Jones

Moreover, we note that in the event the Supreme Court ultimately determines that jurisdiction over the person…