From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cablevision Sys. Dev. v. Bd. of Assessors

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 9, 1979
69 A.D.2d 828 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Opinion

April 9, 1979


In an action, inter alia, to declare that certain property of the plaintiff is entitled to a partial exemption from real property taxes pursuant to section 470 Real Prop. Tax of the Real Property Tax Law, defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 21, 1978, which, inter alia, declared that so much of the plaintiff's equipment as is identical to telephone company equipment is entitled to an exemption. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and complaint dismissed. In the instant action, plaintiff seeks a judgment declaring that certain of its property, which is similar or identical to telephone company equipment, is entitled to a partial exemption from real property taxation (see Real Property Tax Law, § 470). Plaintiff alleges that defendant employed an improper "method" in assessing the property, since the assessment was based on the assumption that cable television equipment was not covered by the ceiling provisions of section 470 Real Prop. Tax of the Real Property Tax Law. The complaint should have been dismissed, since a declaratory judgment action may not be brought on the facts alleged. The property in question is concededly taxable under section 102 (subd 12, par [d]) of the Real Property Tax Law. Since plaintiff does not contend that the tax assessors lacked jurisdiction over the subject property, its exclusive remedy was through the tax certiorari procedure prescribed in article 7 of the Real Property Tax Law (see Sikora Realty Corp. v. City of New York, 262 N.Y. 312; Young Women's Christian Assn. v. City of New York, 217 App. Div. 406, affd 245 N.Y. 562; cf. C.H.O.B. Assoc. v. Board of Assessors of County of Nassau, 45 Misc.2d 184, affd 22 A.D.2d 1015,

affd 16 N.Y.2d 779; Zinder v. Board of Assessors of County of Nassau, 66 Misc.2d 150, affd 38 A.D.2d 836; and Matter of Bertholf v. Cisco, 72 Misc.2d 901, affd 45 A.D.2d 787, which involved challenges to the entire tax roll). Hopkins, J.P., Gulotta, Shapiro and Cohalan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cablevision Sys. Dev. v. Bd. of Assessors

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 9, 1979
69 A.D.2d 828 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)
Case details for

Cablevision Sys. Dev. v. Bd. of Assessors

Case Details

Full title:CABLEVISION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, Respondent, v. BOARD OF ASSESSORS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 9, 1979

Citations

69 A.D.2d 828 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Citing Cases

Somarelli v. Port Jervis Central School Dist

In an action, inter alia, to recover certain real property taxes, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the…

Samuels v. Town of Clarkson

Memorandum: Plaintiffs instituted an action against the Town of Clarkson (Town) seeking damages for monetary…