From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cablevision, Boston Ltd. Partnership v. Flynn

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nov 28, 1989
889 F.2d 377 (1st Cir. 1989)

Opinion

No. 89-1441.

Heard October 3, 1989.

Decided November 28, 1989.

Mark J. Tauber, with whom Nora E. Garrote, Piper Marbury, Washington, D.C., Michael A. Collora and Dwyer Collora, Boston, Mass., was on brief, for appellants.

Bruce A. Singal, with whom Ann Ryan-Small, Ferriter, Scobbo, Sikora, Caruso Rodophele, P.C., Boston, Mass., Patrick J. Costello, Law Dept., Boston City Hall, was on brief, for appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, William G. Young, U.S. District Judge.

Before BOWNES and TORRUELLA, Circuit Judges, and TIMBERS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Senior Circuit Judge for the Second Circuit, sitting by designation.


Upon full consideration of the briefs and record in this case, we affirm the district court's decision on substantially the same grounds as stated in its opinion. See Cablevision of Boston Limited Partnership v. Flynn, 710 F. Supp. 23 (D.Mass. 1989).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Cablevision, Boston Ltd. Partnership v. Flynn

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nov 28, 1989
889 F.2d 377 (1st Cir. 1989)
Case details for

Cablevision, Boston Ltd. Partnership v. Flynn

Case Details

Full title:CABLEVISION OF BOSTON LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, APPELLANTS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit

Date published: Nov 28, 1989

Citations

889 F.2d 377 (1st Cir. 1989)

Citing Cases

Nashoba Communications v. Town of Danvers

The supremacy clause of the Constitution, which is the basis for the pre-emption argument, is concerned with…

Crespo v. Candela Laser Corp.

After all, "[t]he supremacy clause of the Constitution, which is the basis for the preemption argument, is…