From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cabella v. Hirschman

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Feb 1, 1935
154 Misc. 532 (N.Y. App. Term 1935)

Opinion

February 1, 1935.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of New York, Borough of Manhattan, Fourth District.

Blackwell Brothers, for the appellant.

Becker Leibowitz, for the respondent.


A receiver in supplementary proceedings is not authorized to take any property exempt by law from levy. The money which a husband by agreement pays his wife in installments for her support is a debt, which when under twelve dollars per week is not subject to levy even upon application to the court for execution under section 684 of the Civil Practice Act.

Judgment and order reversed, with ten dollars costs, defendant's motion denied and plaintiff's motion granted.

All concur; present, LYDON, HAMMER and FRANKENTHALER, JJ.


Summaries of

Cabella v. Hirschman

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Feb 1, 1935
154 Misc. 532 (N.Y. App. Term 1935)
Case details for

Cabella v. Hirschman

Case Details

Full title:CAROLINE F. CABELLA, Appellant, v. JOSEPH HIRSCHMAN, as Receiver, etc.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1935

Citations

154 Misc. 532 (N.Y. App. Term 1935)
277 N.Y.S. 441