From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caballero v. TDCJ Corr. Officers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Nov 30, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-CV-364 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 30, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-CV-364

11-30-2015

GREGORIO CABALLERO, Plaintiff, v. TDCJ CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS, Defendants.


MEMORANDUM ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Gregorio Caballero, an inmate confined at the Stiles Unit in Beaumont, Texas, proceeding pro se, brought this lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against TDCJ Correctional Officers.

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The Magistrate Judge recommends this action be dismissed without prejudice for failing to exhaust available administrative remedies.

The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available evidence. Plaintiff filed a motion for extension of time to exhaust his administrative remedies. Liberally interpreted, plaintiff's pleading is construed as objections to the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation. This requires a de novo review of the objections in relation to the pleadings and the applicable law. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b).

After careful consideration, the court concludes plaintiff's objections are without merit. Plaintiff requests an extension of time to exhaust his administrative remedies and to be transferred from the Stiles Unit until he has exhausted his administrative remedies because the living conditions at the Stiles Unit are dangerous. However, administrative remedies must be exhausted prior to filing the complaint whether the claims involve general circumstances or particular episodes. See Porter v. Nussle, 534 U.S. 516, 523-32 (2002); Wood v. Hirsch, 461 F. App'x 365, 365 (5th Cir. 2011) (affirming district court's refusal to stay proceedings to enable plaintiff to exhaust and rejecting claim that "emergency conditions" justified excusing the exhaustion requirements). Since plaintiff did not exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing this action, the above-styled action should be dismissed without prejudice to plaintiff's ability to file his claims once he has exhausted the available administrative remedies.

ORDER

Accordingly, plaintiff's objections are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct, and the report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate judge's recommendation.

SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 30th day of November, 2015.

/s/_________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Caballero v. TDCJ Corr. Officers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Nov 30, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-CV-364 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 30, 2015)
Case details for

Caballero v. TDCJ Corr. Officers

Case Details

Full title:GREGORIO CABALLERO, Plaintiff, v. TDCJ CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Date published: Nov 30, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-CV-364 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 30, 2015)