From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

C. T. v. Red Roof Inns, Inc.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Jan 2, 2024
2:22-cv-834-JES-KCD (M.D. Fla. Jan. 2, 2024)

Opinion

2:22-cv-834-JES-KCD

01-02-2024

C. T., Plaintiff, v. RED ROOF INNS, INC., Defendant.


ORDER

Kyle C. Dudek, United States Magistrate Judge

Before the Court is Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Stay Proceedings. (Doc. 250.) A stay is needed, according to the motion, because Plaintiff was recently incarcerated and she is seeking the appointment of a guardian ad litem to “adequately represent her interests.” (Doc. 253 at 3.)

Given the motion is unopposed, and finding good cause presented by Plaintiff's recent incarceration and questions about her competency, the Court will enter a stay under the conditions outlined below.

It is now ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Stay Proceedings (Doc. 250) is GRANTED.
2. The clerk is directed to add a stay flag to this matter pending further order from the Court.
3. Plaintiff is directed to file a status report on the first of each month following this order that addresses the criminal proceedings in Connecticut, her pending request for a guardian ad litem, and whether the stay should be lifted.


Summaries of

C. T. v. Red Roof Inns, Inc.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Jan 2, 2024
2:22-cv-834-JES-KCD (M.D. Fla. Jan. 2, 2024)
Case details for

C. T. v. Red Roof Inns, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:C. T., Plaintiff, v. RED ROOF INNS, INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Jan 2, 2024

Citations

2:22-cv-834-JES-KCD (M.D. Fla. Jan. 2, 2024)

Citing Cases

Doe v. Choice Hotels

It is further “well-established that a franchise relationship does not by itself create an agency…