concluding that the BOP retains sufficient discretion in the means it may use to fulfill the duty to safeguard prisoners, such that the discretionary function exception is applicable
Summary of this case from Ashford v. U.S.No. 98-1373, 98-1572.
May 24, 1999, OCTOBER TERM, 1998.
Certiorari Denied
C.A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 157 F. 3d 1340.
concluding that the BOP retains sufficient discretion in the means it may use to fulfill the duty to safeguard prisoners, such that the discretionary function exception is applicable
Summary of this case from Ashford v. U.S.giving the BOP ample room for judgment by listing a non-exhaustive set of factors in § 3621(b) for the BOP to consider
Summary of this case from McGee v. Thomasconsidering preliminary injunction
Summary of this case from North v. Rooneynoting that "[t]his court has repeatedly stated that while claims are to be construed in light of the specification, they are not necessarily limited by the specification."
Summary of this case from Michaels of Oregon Co. v. Clean Gun, LLCFull title:C. R. BARD, INC. v. M3 SYSTEMS, INC.; M3 SYSTEMS,-INC. v. C. R. BARD, INC
Court:U.S.
Date published: May 24, 1999
However, this Court notes that to secure the extraordinary relief of a preliminary injunction or temporary…
Vandor Corporation v. WilsonHoover Group, Inc. v. Custom Metalcraft, Inc., 66 F.3d 299, 302 (Fed. Cir. 1995). See also MEHL/Biophile…