From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

C-Cation Techs., LLC v. Arris Grp., Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Aug 11, 2017
2016-2561 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 11, 2017)

Opinion

2016-2561

08-11-2017

C-CATION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Appellant v. ARRIS GROUP, INC., COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Appellees

WALTER E. HANLEY, JR., Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by ARMIN GHIAM, SHEILA MORTAZAVI. ANDREW RYAN SOMMER, Winston & Strawn LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellees. Appellee ARRIS Group, Inc. also represented by ERIC M. GOLDSTEIN; JONATHAN E. RETSKY, Chicago, IL. MITCHELL G. STOCKWELL, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Atlanta, GA, for appellee Cox Communications, Inc. Also represented by RICHARD W. GOLDSTUCKER, MICHAEL TURTON.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2015-00635, IPR2015-01796.

JUDGMENT

WALTER E. HANLEY, JR., Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by ARMIN GHIAM, SHEILA MORTAZAVI. ANDREW RYAN SOMMER, Winston & Strawn LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellees. Appellee ARRIS Group, Inc. also represented by ERIC M. GOLDSTEIN; JONATHAN E. RETSKY, Chicago, IL. MITCHELL G. STOCKWELL, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Atlanta, GA, for appellee Cox Communications, Inc. Also represented by RICHARD W. GOLDSTUCKER, MICHAEL TURTON. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (WALLACH, CHEN, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT August 11, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

C-Cation Techs., LLC v. Arris Grp., Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Aug 11, 2017
2016-2561 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 11, 2017)
Case details for

C-Cation Techs., LLC v. Arris Grp., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:C-CATION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Appellant v. ARRIS GROUP, INC., COX…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Aug 11, 2017

Citations

2016-2561 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 11, 2017)

Citing Cases

C-Cation Techs., LLC v. Time Warner Cable Inc.

The PTAB has since found claims 1, 3, and 4 of the '883 patent to be unpatentable, and the Federal Circuit…