From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Byrne v. Trudell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT
May 21, 2013
File No. 1:12-cv-245-jgm-jmc (D. Vt. May. 21, 2013)

Opinion

File No. 1:12-cv-245-jgm-jmc

05-21-2013

JUSTIN L. BYRNE, Plaintiff, v. MARY TRUDELL, JENNA GOGUEN, JOANNE PEREIRA, TOM DUNN, ANDREW PALLITO, JEFFREY LEGGIO, and DAVE NESBITT, Defendants.


ORDER

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation was filed March 18, 2013. (Doc. 24.) After de novo review and over objection, the Report and Recommendation is AFFIRMED, APPROVED and ADOPTED. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 12) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:

1. Pursuant to the doctrine of sovereign immunity, to the extent Plaintiff brings his § 1983 claims against Defendants Pallito and Pereira for money damages in their official capacities, those claims are DISMISSED.

2. Due to their lack of personal involvement, the Fourteenth Amendment claims against Defendants Pereira and Dunn, as well as the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment claims against Defendants Leggio and Nesbitt are DISMISSED.

3. All Eighth Amendment claims are DISMISSED for failure to allege violation of a federal right.

4. The Fourteenth Amendment claims against Defendants Leggio and Nesbitt are DISMISSED for failure to allege violation of a federal right.

5. Pursuant to Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), to the extent Plaintiff seeks immediate release from incarceration, this request for relief is DISMISSED.

6. All claims for punitive damages claims against Defendants Leggio, Nesbitt, Pallito, Pereira, and Dunn are DISMISSED.

7. Pursuant to the Vermont Tort Claims Act, all state tort claims against Defendants Pallito, Pereira, and Dunn are DISMISSED.

8. All remaining bases on which Defendants move to dismiss Plaintiff's claims are DENIED.

9. Plaintiff's "Motion to Strike Pursuant to Rule 12(f)(2)" (Doc. 17) is DENIED.

This matter is returned to Magistrate Judge John M. Conroy for further proceedings.

It is further certified that any appeal taken in forma pauperis from this Order would not be taken in good faith because such an appeal would be frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

SO ORDERED.

Dated at Brattleboro, in the District of Vermont, this 21st day of May, 2013.

____________________________

Honorable J. Garvan Murtha

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Byrne v. Trudell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT
May 21, 2013
File No. 1:12-cv-245-jgm-jmc (D. Vt. May. 21, 2013)
Case details for

Byrne v. Trudell

Case Details

Full title:JUSTIN L. BYRNE, Plaintiff, v. MARY TRUDELL, JENNA GOGUEN, JOANNE PEREIRA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT

Date published: May 21, 2013

Citations

File No. 1:12-cv-245-jgm-jmc (D. Vt. May. 21, 2013)

Citing Cases

Richardson v. Vermont

A pretrial detainee may also have a liberty interest under a state statute or regulation. See Byrne v.…

Couture v. Blair

A claim challenging the validity of a state prisoner's parole revocation on due process grounds is such a…