From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Byrd v. Maddox, Judge

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Oct 31, 1950
233 S.W.2d 990 (Ky. Ct. App. 1950)

Opinion

October 31, 1950.

R.L. Maddox, Judge.

Doyle Byrd petitioned for a writ of mandamus directing the Honorable R.L. Maddox, Judge of Bell Circuit Court and of the 41st Judicial District to require a plaintiff in an action in which the petitioner was the defendant to file a witness' deposition. The Court of Appeals, Cammack, J., held that mandamus would not lie since any order which the lower court might make relative to the deposition would be interlocutory and could be modified or changed during the proceeding, and a final ruling on such a question would be reviewable by appeal.

Writ denied.

Henry L. Bryant, James W. Smith and F.R. Whalin, for petitioner.

A.E. Funk, Jr. and Lay Knuckles, for respondent.


Denying writ.

The petitioner seeks to have this Court direct the respondent, R.L. Maddox, Judge of the Bell Circuit Court, to require that a deposition be filed in an action pending in his court. The petitioner is the defendant in the action before Judge Maddox and he asked the Court to require the plaintiff to file the deposition of a witness. Since we have reached the conclusion that a writ of mandamus will not lie to so control the actions of an inferior court, it is unnecessary that we discuss the circumstances pertaining to the deposition in question. Any order which Judge Maddox might make relative to the deposition would be interlocutory in nature and could be modified or changed by him at any time during the pendency of the proceeding. Furthermore, a final ruling on such a question would be reviewable by appeal.

As said in Jones v. Tartar, 308 Ky. 813, 215 S.W.2d 955, this Court has held frequently that its right to grant a writ under Section 110 of the Constitution will be exercised only in extreme cases. The Court will exercise its original jurisdiction only when an inferior court is acting without jurisdiction, or is acting within its jurisdiction but erroneously and in such a manner that great and irreparable injury will follow therefrom and the petitioner is without adequate remedy.

Writ denied.


Summaries of

Byrd v. Maddox, Judge

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Oct 31, 1950
233 S.W.2d 990 (Ky. Ct. App. 1950)
Case details for

Byrd v. Maddox, Judge

Case Details

Full title:Byrd v. Maddox, Judge

Court:Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Date published: Oct 31, 1950

Citations

233 S.W.2d 990 (Ky. Ct. App. 1950)
233 S.W.2d 990

Citing Cases

Parsley v. Gray

This Court has held frequently that its right to grant a writ under sec. 110 of the Kentucky Constitution…

Inverultra, S.A. v. Wilson

The rule in Kentucky, as well as in most other jurisdictions, has long been that discovery rulings are…