From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Byrd v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Feb 10, 2010
CIVIL ACTION 08-00584-KD-B (S.D. Ala. Feb. 10, 2010)

Summary

holding ALJ erred in not obtaining the testimony of a vocational expert where it was conceivable that nonexertional limitations could have more than minimal effect on vocational base

Summary of this case from Frizzo v. Astrue

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION 08-00584-KD-B.

February 10, 2010


ORDER


After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and dated January 19, 2010, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

Byrd v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Feb 10, 2010
CIVIL ACTION 08-00584-KD-B (S.D. Ala. Feb. 10, 2010)

holding ALJ erred in not obtaining the testimony of a vocational expert where it was conceivable that nonexertional limitations could have more than minimal effect on vocational base

Summary of this case from Frizzo v. Astrue
Case details for

Byrd v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:SONYA VONCILLE BYRD, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division

Date published: Feb 10, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION 08-00584-KD-B (S.D. Ala. Feb. 10, 2010)

Citing Cases

Weiss v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Allen v. Sullivan, 880 F.2d 1200, 1202 (11th Cir. 1989). Courts in this circuit have found similar…

Frizzo v. Astrue

ty to perform basic work activities" (Tr. 14). Specifically, the ALJ found Plaintiff had mild difficulties in…