From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

B.W. King, Inc. v. McAulay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 29, 1965
24 A.D.2d 444 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)

Opinion

June 29, 1965


Judgment unanimously modified on the law and the facts to grant plaintiffs an accounting for the profits of defendants' business in respect to displacement measurement, and as so modified, affirmed, with $50 costs to plaintiffs-respondents-appellants. In this action to enjoin defendants from engaging in the displacement measuring business for scows and barges, we agree with the factual findings of the trial court and that the injunctive provisions of the judgment were well warranted by the proof. However, those same findings also entitle plaintiffs to an accounting for the profits of the business that was wrongfully diverted from them to the defendants ( Defler Corp. v. Kleeman, 19 A.D.2d 396; Bates Chevrolet Corp. v. Haven Chevrolet, 13 A.D.2d 27). Settle order on notice.

Concur — Breitel, J.P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.


Summaries of

B.W. King, Inc. v. McAulay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 29, 1965
24 A.D.2d 444 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)
Case details for

B.W. King, Inc. v. McAulay

Case Details

Full title:B.W. KING, INC., et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. DAVID McAULAY et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 29, 1965

Citations

24 A.D.2d 444 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)

Citing Cases

Epstein Eng'g, P.C. v. Cataldo

for failure to respond to discovery demands for financial statements and tax returns, and granted plaintiff's…

Epstein Eng'g, P.C. v. Cataldo

22, 2013 which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendants Thomas Cataldo and…